Why Not Be Obvious?

Yesterday I wrote about why I believe the Bible teaches that the spiritual life is about submitting oneself to one’s assigned pastor-teacher and learning the word of God on a daily basis under the filling of the Spirit, thus transforming the mind as per the command in Romans 12. As I was pulling the verses together, however, I couldn’t help wondering why God hadn’t been clearer about it, like He was with salvation (Acts 16:31 “Believe in the Lord Jesus and you shall be saved.“). Why didn’t He just say somewhere, “Sit down and listen to your assigned pastor teacher every day and let the word of God transform you.” Then there wouldn’t be any arguing against it. No room for excuses. It’d be right there. Why isn’t it?

Because, for one thing, I think God wanted there to be room for excuses. He wants people to have an out, so they can decline to do what He asks without looking completely foolish and wrong in front of everyone else. Take the several recounted instances where Jesus has just done some miracles and a crowd has gathered and He suddenly “gave orders to depart to the other side” of the Sea of Galilee. (Like in Matt 8:18) 

All those people there get to make a choice — will they get in the boat and go “to the other side” (I love that choice of words) with Him or will they just go back to their homes, chattering excitedly about the day’s entertainment and how they actually saw the famous Jesus.

The idea of dropping everything in your life to get into a boat and go off with this guy is just… weird. Who would really expect anyone to do such a thing, let alone condemn them if they didn’t? In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised if the ones they condemned were the disciples who did go. After all, leaving your family behind? Your job? Wandering about with no direction, no place to lay your head? Isn’t that flaky and irresponsible? Even outright fanatical?

 I think, too, that God’s not made the protocol of the Christian life as bluntly crystal clear as salvation because right away we humans would make it a law. It wouldn’t have to spring out of genuine love, but could come from duty. From a desire to look right before people, etc. Or to look good to God. To “obey,” be a good little girl (or boy), in which case the situation becomes about you. Your performance.

But if you love something, if it’s the most important thing in your life, if it’s a Body, a living, breathing, real-time thing, an interaction between pastor and pupil, and pupil and pupil, God the Holy Spirit flowing through all, talking through all, then you’ll want to do it all on your own. It’s not about obeying a law and doing “the right thing.” It’s about loving someone. Someone who IS truth. And when you hear the truth, you’ll know it for what it is. And it won’t have to be so plainly stated that anyone coming down the road can see it.

Advertisements

4 Responses to “Why Not Be Obvious?”


  1. 1 Mary July 3, 2009 at 9:32 am

    That is explained so well. God is such a perfect gentleman and always presents a choice in privacy of the soul. He also cares about motivation. It’s very challenging.

    Mary

  2. 2 karenhancock July 3, 2009 at 4:25 pm

    Thanks for the comment, Mary! I don’t think many realize how much of a gentleman He is, and how vigilant He is about respecting our freedom to choose…

  3. 3 Rebecca LuElla Miller July 4, 2009 at 1:02 pm

    I think there’s another possibility. I think God works with different people in different ways. Look at the man freed from the legion of demons who wanted to go with Jesus. Instead, Christ told him to go back to his home and tell people what had happened to him. Though what he did looked different to onlookers, he was just as much in obedience as the ones who got in the boat when Jesus said to do so.

    That’s my take on it, anyway.

    Becky

    • 4 karenhancock July 4, 2009 at 2:26 pm

      Thanks for the comment, Becky. It’s true that God works differently with different people. Also true that Christ did different things in accordance with where He was in His ministry time-wise and in relation to the circumstances He was in. But in this case, the difference between the Gerasene demoniac and the people in the crowd of Mt 8:18 is that our Lord told the ex-demoniac face-to-face, one-on-one to go home and tell the people there of what had been done to him (that is, it was a direct, personal command), whereas in Mt 8 He told His “disciples” (which included whoever in the crowd considered themselves a disciple and wanted to follow Him) to get in the boat. The command was not specific and personal, but general.

      Also, the demoniac had already come to Jesus, first to be delivered from the demons, and second to beg to follow Him. His commitment was clear. To follow Jesus, he would have to physically leave the Lord and go proclaim His name to a presumably hostile town (since the local swine industry was not terribly happy about what He had done to their pigs).


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




Categories

My Online Church

Visit my Old Blog Here:

Music I’m Writing To

Transformers (Revenge of the Fallen) Soundtrack - Steve Jablonsky


%d bloggers like this: